<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
> <channel><title>Comments on: Apostrophes &#8211; how to use them</title> <atom:link href="http://www.mantex.co.uk/2009/08/30/english-language-apostrophes/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://www.mantex.co.uk/2009/08/30/english-language-apostrophes/</link> <description>Writng, arts, media, books, and software</description> <lastBuildDate>Mon, 30 Jan 2012 14:42:53 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator> <item><title>By: mantex</title><link>http://www.mantex.co.uk/2009/08/30/english-language-apostrophes/#comment-1084858</link> <dc:creator>mantex</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 29 Dec 2011 13:47:45 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.mantex.co.uk/?p=5039#comment-1084858</guid> <description>Once something is an abbreviation, it behaves in the same way as if it were still the somplete word.
So, you would write &quot;The G&#039;s gun was still smoking&quot;.
You don&#039;t need to put an apostrophe after the G to show it&#039;s an abbreviation.
And note that no apostrophe is necessary when showing plurals. So you would write
&quot;All the Gs were wearing designer suits.&quot;</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Once something is an abbreviation, it behaves in the same way as if it were still the somplete word.</p><p>So, you would write &#8220;The G&#8217;s gun was still smoking&#8221;.</p><p>You don&#8217;t need to put an apostrophe after the G to show it&#8217;s an abbreviation.</p><p>And note that no apostrophe is necessary when showing plurals. So you would write</p><p>&#8220;All the Gs were wearing designer suits.&#8221;</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Jawwaad Hussain</title><link>http://www.mantex.co.uk/2009/08/30/english-language-apostrophes/#comment-1084760</link> <dc:creator>Jawwaad Hussain</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 28 Dec 2011 20:59:43 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.mantex.co.uk/?p=5039#comment-1084760</guid> <description>Right, it seems an odd question, but bear with me. The term &#039;G&#039; is an abbreviation of &#039;Gangster&#039;, right? So would I put an apostrophe after &#039;G&#039; if I was describing something belong to a G? Or would that depend entirely on whether or not I put an apostrophe after &#039;G&#039; to show that it&#039;s an abbreviation?</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Right, it seems an odd question, but bear with me. The term &#8216;G&#8217; is an abbreviation of &#8216;Gangster&#8217;, right? So would I put an apostrophe after &#8216;G&#8217; if I was describing something belong to a G? Or would that depend entirely on whether or not I put an apostrophe after &#8216;G&#8217; to show that it&#8217;s an abbreviation?</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: mantex</title><link>http://www.mantex.co.uk/2009/08/30/english-language-apostrophes/#comment-1083275</link> <dc:creator>mantex</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 21 Dec 2011 11:27:55 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.mantex.co.uk/?p=5039#comment-1083275</guid> <description>When proper names end in -s or -es, it is often said that the punctuation of the possessive case should be determined by how the word is pronounced.
So is you would say MyerZ determination, it would be Myers&#039; determination.
And if you said MyersEZ determination, it would be Myers&#039;s determination.
Personally, I would go with the first.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When proper names end in -s or -es, it is often said that the punctuation of the possessive case should be determined by how the word is pronounced.</p><p>So is you would say MyerZ determination, it would be Myers&#8217; determination.</p><p>And if you said MyersEZ determination, it would be Myers&#8217;s determination.</p><p>Personally, I would go with the first.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: James</title><link>http://www.mantex.co.uk/2009/08/30/english-language-apostrophes/#comment-1082915</link> <dc:creator>James</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 20 Dec 2011 17:31:32 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.mantex.co.uk/?p=5039#comment-1082915</guid> <description>Thanks for your article but what would the correct use of an apostrophe be here:
Meyers&#039; determination...
or Meyers&#039;s determination...
Many thanks!</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for your article but what would the correct use of an apostrophe be here:</p><p>Meyers&#8217; determination&#8230;</p><p>or Meyers&#8217;s determination&#8230;</p><p>Many thanks!</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
