<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
> <channel><title>Comments on: Understanding Media</title> <atom:link href="http://www.mantex.co.uk/2009/07/09/understanding-media/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://www.mantex.co.uk/2009/07/09/understanding-media/</link> <description>Writng, arts, media, books, and software</description> <lastBuildDate>Mon, 30 Jan 2012 14:42:53 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator> <item><title>By: mantex</title><link>http://www.mantex.co.uk/2009/07/09/understanding-media/#comment-18808</link> <dc:creator>mantex</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 09 Aug 2010 09:10:11 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.mantex.co.uk/?p=2388#comment-18808</guid> <description>Yes - it is a little odd in places. But you have to remember that McLuhan was writing about what we now call &#039;media studies&#039; long before anyone else had even noticed media existed.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes &#8211; it is a little odd in places. But you have to remember that McLuhan was writing about what we now call &#8216;media studies&#8217; long before anyone else had even noticed media existed.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Media Books</title><link>http://www.mantex.co.uk/2009/07/09/understanding-media/#comment-18602</link> <dc:creator>Media Books</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sun, 08 Aug 2010 22:05:40 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.mantex.co.uk/?p=2388#comment-18602</guid> <description>This is all round a good book. I have used it during my media studies degree. It is a bit old but no doubt a classic and amazingly percipient, but I find some of the analogies and references rather contrived and stretched. It&#039;s oddly organised, too, as though written for hypertext thirty years before its time. Hard work, but always thought-provoking, and as relevant now (perhaps more so) than when written.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is all round a good book. I have used it during my media studies degree. It is a bit old but no doubt a classic and amazingly percipient, but I find some of the analogies and references rather contrived and stretched. It&#8217;s oddly organised, too, as though written for hypertext thirty years before its time. Hard work, but always thought-provoking, and as relevant now (perhaps more so) than when written.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
